Broker comparison · updated 2026-07-09
FP Markets vs AvaTrade
FP Markets and AvaTrade both publish multi-entity, multi-platform offers, but they differ in pricing model, fee structure, and legal-entity coverage.
Our verdict
FP Markets has the edge overall.
FP Markets is the better fit for traders who want a lower published entry spread on its Raw account, cTrader access, and a simple $100 AUD-equivalent minimum on its forex accounts. AvaTrade is stronger for readers who value a broader set of published entity-level regulators, a larger in-house platform stack, and more explicit fee pages. Both brokers are multi-entity firms, so the exact rules depend on the legal entity and country at onboarding. For cost-sensitive MT4/MT5 traders, FP Markets has the edge; for those who want more regulatory touchpoints and built-in options tools, AvaTrade is the more rounded package.
FP MarketsFP Markets vs AvaTrade at a glance
| FP Markets |
 AvaTrade |
|
|---|---|---|
| Our comparison score | 67 / 100 | 61 / 100 |
| Founded | not published | 2006 |
| Minimum deposit | $100 AUD or eq. | $100 equivalent |
| EUR/USD spread from | 0.0 pips Raw; 1.0 Std | not published |
| Commission | $3/lot each way Raw | spread-only quoted |
| Inactivity fee | entity-dependent | $50 after 3 months |
| Platforms | MT4, MT5, cTrader, TV | WebTrader, MT4, MT5, DupliTrade, AvaOptions |
| Key regulators | ASIC, CySEC, FSCA, FSA Seychelles | CBI, ASIC, FSCA, BVI FSC, Japan FSA/FFAJ, ADGM FSRA |
marks the stronger side on that row. Key numbers were re-checked on 2026-07-09. Terms differ by legal entity and country — confirm on the broker's own legal pages before funding.
Score breakdown
How FP Markets and AvaTrade earn their comparison scores, component by component — same methodology as every review on this site.
FP Markets vs AvaTrade on fees and entry costs
FP Markets publishes two main forex account types: Standard, with spreads from 1.0 pip and no commission, and Raw, with spreads from 0.0 pips plus a stated commission of USD 3.00 per lot each way. Its forex account minimum deposit is $100 AUD or equivalent. AvaTrade publishes a minimum deposit of USD 100, EUR 100, GBP 100, or AUD 100 depending on base currency and eligibility. On fees, AvaTrade says its spread is built into the quote, charges a $50 inactivity fee after 3 months of non-use, and also lists a separate annual administration fee after 12 months of non-use. FP Markets also publishes an inactivity charge in its legal documents, but the amount can vary by entity, so the onboarding jurisdiction matters.
FP Markets vs AvaTrade on platforms
FP Markets publishes MT4, MT5, cTrader, and TradingView support, which gives active traders a wider choice of interfaces and third-party charting than a plain MT4/MT5 setup. Its account pages also show that the broker separates pricing by account type and platform family. AvaTrade publishes WebTrader, MT4, MT5, DupliTrade, and AvaOptions, so its lineup is broader on native add-ons and options-style tools, even though it does not offer cTrader on its main public pages. For copy trading and options-focused users, AvaTrade’s stack is more specialized. For traders who want cTrader and TradingView alongside the MetaTrader pair, FP Markets has the cleaner platform spread.
FP Markets vs AvaTrade on regulation and legal entities
FP Markets’ public documents and site materials reference ASIC, CySEC, FSCA, and Seychelles FSA coverage, but the broker is also explicit that terms depend on the entity used. AvaTrade publishes a longer list of regulators and operating entities, including the Central Bank of Ireland, ASIC, FSCA, BVI FSC, Japan FSA and FFAJ, and ADGM FSRA. That broader public regulatory footprint is a material difference in the comparison, even though the exact protections still vary by onboarded entity. Both firms are multi-jurisdictional rather than single-entity brokers, so traders should confirm which legal entity opens the account before funding. On published regulatory breadth alone, AvaTrade has the edge.
FP Markets vs AvaTrade on funding and withdrawals
FP Markets publishes card, bank transfer, Skrill, and Neteller among its common funding methods, while one regional FAQ also mentions Bitcoin wallet language. AvaTrade publishes credit card, wire transfer, and e-wallet funding on its help pages. For a new retail client, AvaTrade’s deposit rule is straightforward at the headline level: $100 equivalent in the account currency, subject to region and eligibility. FP Markets also anchors its forex account minimum at $100 AUD or equivalent. In practical terms, neither broker is unusually demanding on entry size, but FP Markets gives slightly more named payment methods on its public pages. Because both firms operate through multiple entities, the exact cashier options and processing rules can change by jurisdiction.
FP Markets vs AvaTrade on research and public disclosure
AvaTrade’s fee and jurisdiction pages are especially explicit, with separate help-center articles for minimum deposit, inactivity fee, and operating jurisdiction. FP Markets also publishes account-type pages, legal agreements, and fee-related disclosures, including a transaction-fee framework for forex and CFD products. For research usability, AvaTrade is easier to audit at the legal-entity level because its public pages spell out where different entities operate and which regulator applies. FP Markets is still reasonably transparent, but the evidence is spread across account, legal, and regional pages. For readers who prioritize easy document checking, AvaTrade is marginally stronger; for readers who prioritize platform choice and quoted Raw pricing, FP Markets remains the more cost-focused pick.
Which broker fits you
- You want cTrader or TradingView
- You care about the published Raw account pricing
- You prefer a $100 AUD-equivalent forex entry
- You want more platform variety than options tooling
- You want broader published regulator coverage
- You value explicit fee and jurisdiction pages
- You want DupliTrade or AvaOptions
- You prefer a broker with very clear help-center disclosures
Common questions
Is FP Markets cheaper than AvaTrade for EUR/USD trading?
On FP Markets, the Raw forex account is published from 0.0 pips plus USD 3.00 per lot each way, while the Standard account starts from 1.0 pip with no commission. AvaTrade does not publish a simple public EUR/USD from-spread on the pages reviewed, so the comparison depends on the account type and entity.
Does AvaTrade or FP Markets have stronger regulation?
AvaTrade publishes a wider list of regulators and entities, including the Central Bank of Ireland, ASIC, FSCA, BVI FSC, Japan FSA/FFAJ, and ADGM FSRA. FP Markets publishes ASIC, CySEC, FSCA, and Seychelles FSA references. Because both are multi-entity firms, the exact protections still depend on the onboarding jurisdiction.
Can U.S. residents open FP Markets or AvaTrade accounts?
Neither broker’s public materials point to U.S. retail onboarding, and AvaTrade’s help-center and support pages explicitly note local eligibility limits. FP Markets’ regional disclosures also indicate country restrictions. In both cases, residents should confirm availability before applying, because acceptance varies by legal entity and jurisdiction.
Which is better for platform choice, FP Markets or AvaTrade?
FP Markets has the broader third-party trading mix on the pages reviewed because it publishes MT4, MT5, cTrader, and TradingView. AvaTrade has a different strength set, with WebTrader, MT4, MT5, DupliTrade, and AvaOptions. If you want cTrader, FP Markets is the clearer match; if you want copy or options tools, AvaTrade is stronger.