Broker comparison · updated 2026-07-29

CMC Markets vs FP Markets

CMC Markets favors traders seeking a proprietary multi-asset platform; FP Markets is better suited to those who want cTrader alongside MetaTrader and TradingView.

CMC Markets
69.5/ 100 · our score
FCA
Full CMC Markets review
FP Markets
67/ 100 · our score
ASICCySECFSCASeychelles FSA
Full FP Markets review

Our verdict

It depends on what you trade.

This CMC Markets vs FP Markets comparison turns primarily on platform preference and legal entity. CMC Markets is the stronger match for traders who want its Next Generation platform, a large stated instrument range, and UK-facing terms that include no required minimum deposit. FP Markets is more compelling for MetaTrader and cTrader users who want a Raw account structure with spreads from 0.0 pips and a stated $3-per-side commission per standard lot. Neither is a simple universal choice: available products, leverage, payment methods, fees, and client protections depend on the entity and country assigned at onboarding.

Both hold up

CMC Markets vs FP Markets at a glance

CMC Markets FP Markets
Our comparison score69.5 / 10067 / 100
Founded19892005
Minimum depositNo required deposit stated (UK)$100 or equivalent
EUR/USD published minimum0.0 pips, FX Active0.0 pips, Raw
Raw/active FX commission$2.50 per $100k notional, per side$3 per lot, per side
PlatformsNext Gen, MT4, MT5, TradingViewMT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView
Stated instrument range13,000+ on Next Gen and MT510,000+ across seven asset classes
Inactivity fee£10 monthly after 12 months (UK)$10 monthly after 90 days (Seychelles)
Key cited regulatorFCA 173730 (CMC Markets UK plc)ASIC 286354; CySEC 371/18

marks the stronger side on that row. Key numbers were re-checked on 2026-07-29. Terms differ by legal entity and country — confirm on the broker's own legal pages before funding.

Score breakdown

How CMC Markets and FP Markets earn their comparison scores, component by component — same methodology as every review on this site.

Regulation & oversightout of 30
CMC Markets
27
FP Markets
26
Transparency of termsout of 20
CMC Markets
17
FP Markets
16
Platforms & toolsout of 15
CMC Markets
14
FP Markets
14
Funding & withdrawalsout of 10
CMC Markets
8
FP Markets
8
External sentimentout of 10
CMC Markets
9.5
FP Markets
7

CMC Markets vs FP Markets fees: account model decides the result

Edge: CMC MarketsCMC's FX Active commission is lower on the cited USD pricing.

Choose CMC Markets if you use its FX Active pricing and can compare the all-in commission against your usual trade size. Its published FX Active terms show EUR/USD spreads from 0.0 pips and a $2.50 commission per $100,000 notional value per side; the UK standard CFD account publishes forex spreads from 0.5 pips. Choose FP Markets if a conventional Raw account is easier to assess: its published Raw MT4/MT5 terms start at 0.0 pips and charge $3 per standard lot each way, while the Standard account starts from 1.0 pip with no separate forex commission. These are minimum, not typical, spreads, and neither broker publishes one universal typical EUR/USD figure across all entities. CMC's dormant-account charge begins after 12 months; FP Markets' Seychelles agreement specifies $10 monthly after 90 days of inactivity.

Platform choice: Next Generation depth or FP Markets cTrader access

Edge: FP MarketsFP Markets offers cTrader as well as MT4, MT5, and TradingView.

CMC Markets has the clearer advantage for a trader who wants a broker-built environment rather than relying exclusively on third-party terminals. Next Generation combines web and mobile dealing with integrated charting, economic-calendar functions, client sentiment, and a broad product library. CMC also lists MT4, MT5, and TradingView connectivity, although availability and the instrument list can vary by region. FP Markets is the more natural fit for a trader already committed to platform portability. It offers MT4, MT5, cTrader, and TradingView, with its public site describing Raw availability across those choices. That cTrader option matters for users who prefer its order-management workflow or copy-trading ecosystem. Both firms support algorithmic use through the MetaTrader family. Check the account-opening flow, not a global platform page, to confirm which platform and symbols your entity actually supplies.

Regulation comparison: the named entity matters more than the brand

Even matchBoth require entity-by-entity checks before funding.

For a UK resident accepted by CMC Markets UK plc, CMC's FCA registration is a material point of reference: the firm is listed under FCA number 173730. FP Markets operates through a more dispersed group structure. Its official disclosures name ASIC-regulated First Prudential Markets Pty Ltd, CySEC-regulated First Prudential Markets Ltd, an FSCA-regulated South African entity, and a Seychelles FSA-regulated entity, among other regional operations. That wider map does not automatically mean identical safeguards. Compensation arrangements, leverage caps, negative-balance provisions, dispute routes, and product availability depend on the contracting company. CMC also serves clients through different entities outside the UK. Before depositing, identify the full company name in the client agreement, confirm it on the relevant regulator register, and read the entity-specific risk disclosure. Regulation reduces some firm-level risks; it does not protect a CFD position from market losses.

Funding and withdrawals: compare the local payment schedule, not logos

Even matchPayment methods and charges differ materially by entity and currency.

CMC Markets publishes region-specific funding instructions rather than one global payment menu. Its UK FAQ lists debit or credit card, online banking, and bank transfer; Australian materials additionally list PayID and PayPal. Card and bank-transfer withdrawal options are likewise documented in certain regional pages, with fees and processing times varying by location. FP Markets also presents payment options through regional pages and client portals, so the exact selection should be verified after choosing a country site and legal entity. The practical edge is not the number of payment badges: it is whether the method is available in your account currency, whether the broker or your bank charges a fee, and whether withdrawals must return first to the original funding source. CMC's Australian fee schedule, for example, applies card charges in some currencies. Both brokers require payments from an account in the client's own name and may reject third-party transfers.

Research tools: CMC Markets favors integrated discretionary workflow

Edge: CMC MarketsNext Generation integrates proprietary analysis and execution tools.

CMC Markets is the better fit for a discretionary trader who wants research and execution in the same proprietary interface. Its Next Generation environment includes an economic calendar, client sentiment, pattern-recognition tools, and extensive charting features, while the broker states that its MT5 and Next Generation platforms provide access to more than 13,000 instruments. FP Markets takes a more platform-led approach: it offers market analysis and education, but its core appeal is the choice between MetaTrader, cTrader, and TradingView. Its public website states a range of more than 10,000 instruments across seven asset classes, though the accessible total can differ by platform and jurisdiction. Neither research suite removes the need for independent trade validation. Traders should test the demo, examine live-market data permissions, and check whether the products they follow are actually available on the selected account before treating an advertised instrument count as actionable coverage.

Which broker fits you

Choose CMC Markets if
  • You want CMC Markets' Next Generation platform and its integrated discretionary-trading tools.
  • You trade under CMC's UK terms and value the absence of a stated mandatory minimum deposit.
  • Your expected FX Active trading size makes its published notional-based commission competitive.
  • You want a stated 13,000+ instrument range on Next Generation or MT5, subject to eligibility.
Choose FP Markets if
  • You specifically want cTrader without changing brokers.
  • You prefer FP Markets' Raw account format: 0.0-pip minimum spreads plus a stated per-lot commission.
  • You use MetaTrader or TradingView and want to compare several external-platform workflows.
  • Your assigned FP Markets entity offers the instruments, protections, and payment method you need.

Common questions

Is CMC Markets or FP Markets cheaper for EUR/USD trading?

It depends on account type and trade size. CMC Markets publishes FX Active spreads from 0.0 pips with a $2.50 commission per $100,000 notional value per side. FP Markets publishes Raw spreads from 0.0 pips with a $3 commission per standard lot per side. Minimum spreads are not typical spreads, and overnight financing can change the overall cost.

Does FP Markets offer more platforms than CMC Markets?

FP Markets lists MT4, MT5, cTrader, and TradingView. CMC Markets lists Next Generation, MT4, MT5, and TradingView. The numerical count is similar, but the meaningful distinction is cTrader at FP Markets versus CMC's proprietary Next Generation platform. Platform availability can differ by client entity and region.

Are CMC Markets and FP Markets available to US residents?

FP Markets' official disclosure says it does not offer services to US residents. CMC Markets' retail CFD and spread-betting offering is also not a standard option for US retail clients. US residents should use a broker authorized for the specific products they seek in the United States rather than assuming an overseas CFD account is available.

Which broker has the lower inactivity fee, CMC Markets or FP Markets?

The answer depends on the legal entity and how long the account is unused. CMC's UK materials state a £10 monthly charge after 12 months without trading activity. FP Markets' Seychelles client agreement states a $10 monthly charge after 90 days of inactivity. Currency amounts, trigger periods, and exclusions can differ under other entities.

Sources for this comparison (8)The primary pages we relied on — worth reading before you open an account.
Risk warning. Forex and CFD trading involves significant risk. Always verify a broker's legal entity, regulator status, fees, restrictions and withdrawal rules before depositing funds.
How we make money. TopOnlineForexBrokers may earn compensation from some broker links. That never changes what we write about a broker, and we say so plainly wherever it applies.