Broker comparison · updated 2026-07-09
IG vs easyMarkets
IG and easyMarkets both have long operating histories, but they differ in pricing, platform depth, and how clearly their legal entities are presented.
Our verdict
IG has the edge overall.
IG is the stronger pick if you want broader public disclosure, a larger global footprint, and a more established UK-regulated core entity. Its official help pages spell out client-money handling, funding costs, and regional differences more clearly than many peers. easyMarkets is competitive on platform choice and shows clean official pricing pages, including fixed-spread disclosure and a low published entry point on some account types. The catch for both is jurisdiction: terms, protections, and even product access change by legal entity and country, so the better choice depends on where you open the account and which platform set you want.
IGIG vs easyMarkets at a glance
| IG |
 easyMarkets |
|
|---|---|---|
| Our comparison score | 67.5 / 100 | 62.5 / 100 |
| Founded | 1974 | 2001 |
| Main regulators | FCA; ASIC; MAS; others | CySEC; ASIC |
| Platforms | Web, mobile, MT4 | Web/app, TradingView, MT4, MT5 |
| Minimum deposit | Not published globally | 25 USD on some accounts |
| EUR/USD spread from | Not published here | 0.7 pips |
| Deposits/withdrawals | No fee if no FX conversion | Card, eWallet, bank transfer |
| Client money note | Segregated under FCA rules | Entity-specific, confirm locally |
marks the stronger side on that row. Key numbers were re-checked on 2026-07-09. Terms differ by legal entity and country — confirm on the broker's own legal pages before funding.
Score breakdown
How IG and easyMarkets earn their comparison scores, component by component — same methodology as every review on this site.
IG vs easyMarkets on fees and trading costs
IG publishes a wide set of fee pages, but pricing is not uniform across entities or products. Its help centre says deposits and withdrawals are not charged if no currency conversion is needed, while other costs can apply such as live market data fees and product-specific dealing charges. For forex, IG’s US product page shows EUR/CHF average spread of 2.6 pips; the exact EUR/USD figure is not presented in the sources reviewed here, so it should be treated as not published in this comparison set. easyMarkets is more explicit on its own pricing pages: it shows EUR/USD from 0.7 pips on one account type and 1.7 pips on another, with fixed-spread language on its platform pages. That makes easyMarkets easier to benchmark on headline FX pricing, while IG looks more layered and market-specific.
IG vs easyMarkets on platforms and trading tools
IG’s current UK help pages confirm web and mobile access plus MT4 in supported regions, and its MT4 funding guide shows that MT4 accounts are managed through My IG rather than directly inside MT4. easyMarkets lists a wider named platform set on its official pages: easyMarkets web/app, TradingView, MT4, and MT5. It also highlights proprietary features such as guaranteed stop loss with no slippage on its own platforms, which is a meaningful difference for traders who want built-in risk controls. IG’s platform line-up is still solid, especially for traders who want a mainstream broker with a long track record, but easyMarkets has the broader named platform menu in the sources verified here. As always, platform access can differ by legal entity and local rules.
IG vs easyMarkets on regulation and legal structure
IG’s FCA-facing disclosures are the stronger part of its public profile in the sources reviewed. IG states that client money and assets are separated from the firm’s own resources, and the FCA register materials point to IG Markets Ltd as a regulated UK firm. easyMarkets’ current CySEC register entry identifies Easy Forex Trading Ltd, and CySEC’s approved-domains list ties that entity to the easyMarkets and Easy Forex web brands. easyMarkets also shows an Australia-linked presence in its official materials, but the brand/entity overlap means traders should confirm the exact contracting firm before opening an account. IG therefore has the edge on regulator breadth and public entity clarity in this comparison set, while easyMarkets still looks properly supervised in the jurisdictions verified here. Regulation does not remove trading risk for either firm.
IG vs easyMarkets on deposits, withdrawals, and account funding
IG’s help pages do not show one universal minimum deposit for all countries and methods, which is a point in its favor on honesty but not on simplicity. Its official materials say deposits and withdrawals are not charged by IG when no currency conversion is involved, and its MT4 funding page confirms that account funding is handled through My IG. easyMarkets publishes a clearer low-entry figure on one EU account page: minimum funding of 25 USD for standard and MT5 accounts, while VIP pricing is higher. Its withdrawal page also confirms card withdrawals generally return funds to the original card up to the deposited amount, with profits sent to a bank account. The practical difference is that easyMarkets gives faster visible guidance on entry funding, while IG is more fragmented by region and payment method.
IG vs easyMarkets on research, disclosure, and transparency
IG’s published help content is extensive and operationally specific, covering client money, costs, market data fees, and product details by market. That makes it easier to verify how the broker works day to day, even if the answer sometimes depends on region. easyMarkets also maintains a broad learning centre and product pages, and its official materials describe fixed spreads, platform-specific features, and long-running service since 2001. In this comparison, IG feels more institutional and more detailed on legal and fee disclosure, while easyMarkets feels more product-marketing-driven but still reasonably transparent on pricing and platform structure. The research edge goes to IG because its public documentation is more detailed and easier to audit from a compliance perspective. That said, easyMarkets is the simpler read if your priority is seeing spreads and platform options quickly.
Which broker fits you
- You want the stronger UK-regulated core entity
- You prefer more detailed public fee and client-money disclosures
- You want a broker with a broader global regulatory footprint
- You are willing to accept a more fragmented regional rule set
- You want a clearly published low minimum funding figure
- You want TradingView plus MT5 alongside web/app and MT4
- You prefer easier-to-read fixed-spread disclosures
- You are opening the account in a jurisdiction where easyMarkets terms fit better
Common questions
Is IG or easyMarkets better for forex trading?
IG is better if you value a larger, more established broker with stronger public disclosure and a broader regulatory footprint. easyMarkets is more attractive if you want simple platform choices and clearer headline FX pricing. The better fit depends on your legal entity, country, and the exact product you plan to trade.
Does easyMarkets have lower spreads than IG?
For the sources verified here, easyMarkets publishes a clearer EUR/USD starting spread of 0.7 pips on some accounts. IG’s current public pages reviewed here did not give a comparable EUR/USD headline in the same way, so a direct like-for-like comparison is not fully available from the verified materials.
Is IG regulated better than easyMarkets?
IG has the edge in this comparison because its FCA-regulated UK disclosure and broader global regulator set are easier to verify from primary sources. easyMarkets is also regulated, including by CySEC and ASIC, but the brand/entity structure is less straightforward and needs more careful checking before funding.
Can I use MT4 with IG and easyMarkets?
Yes. IG supports MT4 in supported regions, and easyMarkets lists MT4 alongside its own web/app platform, TradingView, and MT5. Availability still depends on the country and the legal entity that onboarded the account.