Broker comparison · updated 2026-07-09
Capital.com vs IG
Capital.com and IG are both multi-entity CFD brokers, but they differ in platform mix, minimum funding rules, and how much regional detail they publish.
Our verdict
It depends on what you trade.
IG is the stronger pick for traders who want a large, long-established broker with broad regulator coverage and clear entity-level disclosures. Capital.com is more attractive if you want a simpler proprietary platform stack, TradingView support, and a clearly published low entry deposit on card and Apple Pay funding. On fees, both publish no deposit or withdrawal fee policies, but IG’s card minimum is higher and its minimum deposit varies by region and method, while Capital.com states 10 USD/EUR/GBP for cards and Apple Pay, with 50 EUR for wire transfers. The better choice depends heavily on your country and the legal entity you open with. Leverage and CFD risk still apply at both firms. ([capital.com](https://capital.com/en-int/ways-to-trade/fees-and-charges?utm_source=openai))
Capital.com vs IG at a glance
Capital.com |
IG |
|
|---|---|---|
| Our comparison score | 73.5 / 100 | 67.5 / 100 |
| Minimum deposit | 10 USD/EUR/GBP cards; 50 EUR wire | $50 card; no bank-transfer minimum |
| Deposit/withdrawal fee | No fee published | No fee if no FX conversion |
| Platforms | Web, app, TradingView, MT4 | Web, app, MT4 |
| Regulators | FCA, CySEC, ASIC, SCB | FCA, BaFin, ASIC, CFTC, more |
| Demo account | Available | Available on MT4 in some regions |
marks the stronger side on that row. Key numbers were re-checked on 2026-07-09. Terms differ by legal entity and country — confirm on the broker's own legal pages before funding.
Score breakdown
How Capital.com and IG earn their comparison scores, component by component — same methodology as every review on this site.
Capital.com vs IG on fees and minimum funding
Capital.com publishes a straightforward funding page: no deposit fee, no withdrawal fee, and a minimum deposit of 10 USD/EUR/GBP for bank cards and Apple Pay, with wire transfers starting at 50 EUR or the equivalent in base currency. IG also says it does not charge for deposits or withdrawals when no currency conversion is needed, but its minimum deposit is not a single global number. Its help center states that card payments start at $50, while bank transfers have no minimum, and the minimum shown can change by payment screen and region. For traders who care about a clearly posted entry amount, Capital.com is easier to read; for traders who mainly use bank transfer, IG can be flexible. Terms differ by entity and country. ([capital.com](https://capital.com/en-int/ways-to-trade/fees-and-charges?utm_source=openai))
Capital.com vs IG on platform lineup
Capital.com offers a broader consumer-facing platform stack on its main site: web platform, mobile app, TradingView, and MT4, with MT5 also mentioned on some official materials. That gives it a more flexible menu for chart-heavy traders who want either the broker’s own interface or an external charting workflow. IG’s current platform pages show a web platform, mobile app, and MT4, and its materials also reference MT4 and MT5 costs in some regions, but the core public lineup is narrower than Capital.com’s. IG still has the advantage of scale and long operating history, yet platform choice alone favors Capital.com for many retail CFD users. As always, platform availability can vary by legal entity and location. ([capital.com](https://capital.com/en-int?utm_source=openai))
Capital.com vs IG on regulation and legal-entity clarity
Capital.com’s help and policy pages identify multiple regulated entities, including FCA, CySEC, ASIC, and the Securities Commission of The Bahamas, with entity-specific registration and license details. IG’s public materials also list a wide regulator footprint, including the FCA, BaFin and Deutsche Bundesbank, ASIC, MAS, FMA, JFSA, FSCA, Bermuda Monetary Authority, and the CFTC in the U.S. The key practical point is that both brokers operate through separate entities, so protections, leverage limits, and product availability are not uniform worldwide. IG has the edge on breadth of named regulators, while Capital.com still scores well on public disclosure because it spells out specific entity and license information clearly. Neither should be treated as universally equivalent across jurisdictions. ([help.capital.com](https://help.capital.com/hc/en-us/articles/360016569340-Who-is-your-regulator?utm_source=openai))
Capital.com vs IG on deposits, withdrawals, and account funding
Capital.com says deposits and withdrawals are free and publishes method-specific minimums, which makes its funding rules relatively easy to audit before opening an account. IG also says deposits and withdrawals are free if no currency conversion is required, but it adds more regional variation: card payments have a $50 minimum in its current help article, while bank transfers have no minimum. That gives IG flexibility, but less simplicity for a comparison page. For users funding by card or Apple Pay, Capital.com is more transparent on the entry threshold; for users who prefer bank transfer, IG’s no-minimum bank funding can be useful. In both cases, the exact terms depend on the legal entity and the country of residence. ([capital.com](https://capital.com/en-int/ways-to-trade/fees-and-charges?utm_source=openai))
Capital.com vs IG on research and disclosures
Both brokers publish a workable amount of public detail, but IG’s long-standing multi-entity structure and market coverage are easier to see across its help pages and platform materials. Capital.com is more explicit on some operational items, especially fees and funding, and its main site also lists no deposit or withdrawal fees alongside platform options. IG’s advantage is a deeper set of public references across markets and regulator listings, which can help when checking the exact legal entity before funding. For traders choosing between them, the research question is less about who has more marketing and more about who publishes the most relevant operational facts in a format you can verify quickly. On that point, IG has the broader institutional profile, while Capital.com is often simpler to compare on day-to-day costs. ([capital.com](https://capital.com/en-int?utm_source=openai))
Which broker fits you
- You want a lower published minimum deposit
- You want TradingView plus a proprietary app
- You prefer very clear fee and funding pages
- You want a broader global regulator footprint
- You care most about a large established broker profile
- You are funding by bank transfer and want no stated minimum
Common questions
Is Capital.com cheaper than IG?
Not universally. Capital.com publishes a lower card and Apple Pay minimum deposit, and both brokers say deposits and withdrawals can be free under stated conditions. IG’s bank-transfer minimum is zero, but card funding starts at $50 in its current help page. Pricing still depends on product, entity, and currency conversion.
Is IG better regulated than Capital.com?
IG lists a wider set of regulators across regions, while Capital.com still publishes solid entity-level disclosures for its FCA, CySEC, ASIC, and Bahamas entities. “Better regulated” is not a simple ranking, because the right comparison depends on which legal entity you open with and where you live.
Does Capital.com or IG offer MT4?
Both do, but Capital.com publishes a broader main-site platform stack that also includes TradingView and its own web and mobile platforms. IG offers web, mobile, and MT4, with MT5 references appearing in some regional materials. Platform availability can vary by jurisdiction.
Which is safer, Capital.com or IG?
Neither should be described as safe. Both are regulated brokers, but they offer leveraged products that can lose money rapidly. The better question is which legal entity, client-money regime, and product set fit your country and risk tolerance.

