Crypto

Crypto custody

Also calleddigital asset custody

Crypto custody is the safeguarding and control arrangement for the private keys or other authorization mechanisms needed to transfer crypto assets. It may be self-custody by the asset holder or third-party custody by a service provider acting under contractual and, where applicable, regulatory obligations.

Evidence passport

What this page checked.

Sources
3
Record updated
August 18, 2026

Crypto custody — definition, practical meaning, example, and common interpretation risk checked against the linked reference material

Definition checked

  • Definition and plain-English explanation for “Crypto custody”
  • The worked example and the distinction described in the watch-out note
  • Reference material: SEC — Crypto asset activities and distributed ledger technology FAQs, SEC — Statement on custody of crypto asset securities by broker-dealers

Use the term correctly

  • Read the connected terms when a definition depends on another market concept
  • Check the broker’s contract specification when applying the term to a particular product
  • Treat examples as explanations of mechanics, not as prices, forecasts, or trading advice

Method. Editorial desk review of the definition, example, related concepts, and 3 linked sources. Calculations are checked directly where the entry contains arithmetic

Research scope and limits +
  • This glossary entry explains terminology and does not test a broker, trading account, platform, or live market condition
  • Contract wording and practical treatment can differ across brokers, venues, jurisdictions, and products
Page change log +
  1. Added named authorship, a definition evidence record, application checks, and a concise scope disclosure

What Crypto custody means

With self-custody, the user controls the keys and bears responsibility for backups and transaction authorization. With third-party custody, a firm controls keys or signing systems for the client, often using account controls, operational policies, and segregated or pooled wallet arrangements. The legal rights, insolvency treatment, withdrawal process, and protections vary by provider and jurisdiction.

Custody determines who can move assets, who handles recovery, and what risks arise if keys are lost, systems fail, or the custodian becomes insolvent. Regulation and institutional safeguards can impose important requirements, but they do not eliminate market risk, technology risk, fraud risk, or the possibility of loss.

An investment adviser selects a third-party custodian for client crypto assets. Before using it, the adviser assesses how assets are recorded, who can authorize withdrawals, how private keys are protected, and whether independent verification is available. By contrast, a client using self-custody must manage those key-protection and recovery controls directly.

Common questions

Does using a custodian mean I own the private keys?+

Usually, no. In third-party custody, the provider normally controls the keys or signing process under its service arrangement. Your rights are defined by the account agreement, applicable law, and the custodian’s records.

Does regulation eliminate custody risk?+

No. Regulatory oversight and safeguarding requirements may reduce certain operational or conduct risks, but they cannot guarantee asset recovery, prevent every breach, or eliminate counterparty, legal, or market risks.

Go to the original material.

01SEC — Crypto asset activities and distributed ledger technology FAQs02SEC — Statement on custody of crypto asset securities by broker-dealers03SEC — Safeguarding Advisory Client Assets proposed rule