Broker comparison · updated 2026-07-09
GBE Brokers vs easyMarkets
GBE Brokers is more compact and CySEC-centered; easyMarkets brings a broader platform lineup and clearer funding disclosures.
Our verdict
easyMarkets has the edge overall.
easyMarkets has the edge for most traders who want more published platform choice, clearer funding information, and a wider public footprint across entities and regions. GBE Brokers is the cleaner pick if you value a straightforward Cyprus-regulated setup and a smaller, more focused broker profile. On the downside, both firms require country-by-country and entity-by-entity checking, because terms can differ by legal entity. For fee-sensitive traders, easyMarkets’ published fixed-spread structure and GBE Brokers’ published account table both matter, but easyMarkets is easier to research from public materials. Overall, easyMarkets is the stronger all-round choice, while GBE Brokers can still suit traders who prefer a more compact regulatory story.
easyMarketsGBE Brokers vs easyMarkets at a glance
 GBE Brokers |
easyMarkets |
|
|---|---|---|
| Our comparison score | 64.5 / 100 | 62.5 / 100 |
| Founded | Not published clearly | 2001 |
| Main regulators | CySEC | CySEC, ASIC |
| CySEC license | 240/14 | 079/07 |
| Platforms | MT4, MT5, TradingView | Web/App, TradingView, MT4, MT5 |
| Minimum deposit | €1,000 (entry account) | $25 standard; $10,000 VIP |
| Instruments | 1,000+ CFD instruments | 275+ to 300+ markets |
| Withdrawal fee | 0.15% outside SEPA | Not clearly published |
| Deposit fee | PayPal 3.5% | Not clearly published |
marks the stronger side on that row. Key numbers were re-checked on 2026-07-09. Terms differ by legal entity and country — confirm on the broker's own legal pages before funding.
Score breakdown
How GBE Brokers and easyMarkets earn their comparison scores, component by component — same methodology as every review on this site.
GBE Brokers vs easyMarkets on fees and published trading costs
GBE Brokers publishes account pricing and says its minimum deposit starts at €1,000 on the entry account, with higher tiers at €10,000 and €100,000. Its public funding page also lists card and PayPal-related charges, including a 3.5% PayPal deposit fee and a 0.15% withdrawal charge outside SEPA, with minimums stated for withdrawals. easyMarkets publishes a different structure: its account page shows a $25 minimum deposit for standard and MT5 accounts, while a VIP tier starts at $10,000. It also publishes fixed-spread examples such as EUR/USD from 0.7 pips on some account types. For cost visibility, easyMarkets is easier to compare at a glance, while GBE Brokers gives more detail on some payment charges but less on the broader cost picture.
GBE Brokers vs easyMarkets on platforms and product access
GBE Brokers publicly confirms MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, and TradingView, and says it offers more than 1,000 CFD instruments across forex, metals, shares, futures, indices, bonds, crypto, and commodities. That is a strong headline product range, especially for traders who want MT4/MT5 plus TradingView from the same broker. easyMarkets publishes an even broader platform stack: its current materials confirm easyMarkets web/app, TradingView, MT4, and MT5, along with mobile access on iOS and Android. Its public materials also point to 275+ or 300+ tradable markets depending on the page and locale. The practical difference is that easyMarkets has the more fully documented platform ecosystem, while GBE Brokers has the simpler but still credible lineup. If you want more platform choice, easyMarkets has the edge.
GBE Brokers vs easyMarkets on regulation and legal entities
GBE Brokers states that GBE brokers Ltd. is regulated by CySEC under CIF licence 240/14, and CySEC’s public register links the firm to approved domains and a Cyprus address. easyMarkets’ CySEC register entry shows Easy Forex Trading Ltd with licence 079/07 and approved domains including easy-markets.com and easymarkets.eu. easyMarkets also says it is regulated by ASIC, which gives it a second major supervisory relationship beyond Cyprus. That matters because legal entity and country terms can differ. On public evidence alone, easyMarkets has the broader regulatory footprint, while GBE Brokers has the more compact and straightforward Cyprus-only picture. For traders who want a second top-tier regulator in the mix, easyMarkets has the advantage; for those who prefer a narrower structure, GBE Brokers is easier to map.
GBE Brokers vs easyMarkets on deposits, withdrawals, and money movement
GBE Brokers publishes more detail on payment mechanics than many smaller brokers: it states that withdrawals are normally made back to the original funding method, and it publishes fees for PayPal deposits and non-SEPA withdrawals. It does not clearly publish a universal minimum deposit on all public pages, but its account table does show tiered starting deposits. easyMarkets also publishes funding guidance and withdrawal rules, including card withdrawals returning funds to the card used for deposit, and it lists common methods such as cards, e-wallets, and bank transfer in public-facing materials. The trade-off is that easyMarkets is more transparent on the range of funding channels, while GBE Brokers is more specific on certain charges. For a new client, easyMarkets is easier to understand before opening an account.
GBE Brokers vs easyMarkets on research, education, and public disclosure
GBE Brokers’ public site is useful for legal documentation and compliance pages, but its current materials are thinner on education and research. easyMarkets publishes a larger library of platform, education, and market-explainer content, including Learn Centre material and platform pages that spell out spreads and account features. That does not make easyMarkets “safer,” but it does make due diligence easier because more of the operating model is visible before signup. GBE Brokers still scores well on compliance visibility and entity clarity, especially for a Cyprus-regulated broker with a Hamburg branch reference, but its public offer is less complete in day-to-day trading details. If you value a richer public information trail, easyMarkets has the edge; if you mainly want a compact compliance footprint, GBE Brokers remains viable.
Which broker fits you
- You want a simpler CySEC-centered broker profile
- You prefer GBE Brokers’ published account table and fee details
- You are comfortable with less public detail on funding and platform depth
- You want more platform choice and clearer public product pages
- You want a lower published minimum deposit
- You want CySEC plus ASIC oversight and broader funding options
Common questions
Is GBE Brokers or easyMarkets better regulated?
easyMarkets has the broader public regulatory footprint because its current materials and register records point to CySEC and ASIC. GBE Brokers has a clear CySEC record as well, but the public picture is narrower. In both cases, the exact protections and terms can vary by legal entity and country, so the account-opening entity matters.
Does GBE Brokers or easyMarkets have lower minimum deposits?
easyMarkets publishes a lower starting point on its current account pages: $25 for standard and MT5 accounts, with a $10,000 VIP tier. GBE Brokers publishes an entry account minimum of €1,000. If starting balance matters, easyMarkets is the lower-cost entry point.
Which broker has more platforms, GBE Brokers or easyMarkets?
easyMarkets has the more complete public platform lineup because it clearly lists its own web/app platform alongside TradingView, MT4, and MT5. GBE Brokers confirms MT4, MT5, and TradingView, but its public platform documentation is thinner. For platform choice and documentation, easyMarkets has the edge.
Are GBE Brokers and easyMarkets terms the same in every country?
No. Both brokers note that terms can differ by legal entity, regulator, and client location. That affects leverage, funding options, spreads, and sometimes which platform or account features are available. Before funding an account, verify the exact legal entity and regional terms that apply to you.